Second: You can make a tax deductible contribution via VDARE by clicking here. (Paypal and credit cards accepted, including recurring "subscription" donations.) UPDATE: Don't try this at the moment.
Third: send money via the Paypal-like Google Wallet to my Gmail address (that's isteveslrATgmail.com -- replace the AT with a @). (Non-tax deductible.)
Here's the Google Wallet FAQ. From it: "You will need to have (or sign up for) Google Wallet to send or receive money. If you have ever purchased anything on Google Play, then you most likely already have a Google Wallet. If you do not yet have a Google Wallet, don’t worry, the process is simple: go to wallet.google.com and follow the steps." You probably already have a Google ID and password, which Google Wallet uses, so signing up Wallet is pretty painless.
You can put money into your Google Wallet Balance from your bank account and send it with no service fee.
Or you can send money via credit card (Visa, MasterCard, AmEx, Discover) with the industry-standard 2.9% fee. (You don't need to put money into your Google Wallet Balance to do this.)
Google Wallet works from both a website and a smartphone app (Android and iPhone -- the Google Wallet app is currently available only in the U.S., but the Google Wallet website can be used in 160 countries).
Or, once you sign up with Google Wallet, you can simply send money via credit card, bank transfer, or Wallet Balance as an attachment from Google's free Gmail email service. Here's how to do it.
(Non-tax deductible.)
Fourth: if you have a Wells Fargo bank account, you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Wells Fargo SurePay. Just tell WF SurePay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). (Non-tax deductible.)
Fifth: if you have a Chase bank account (or, theoretically,other bank accounts), you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Chase QuickPay (FAQ). Just tell Chase QuickPay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address (steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). If Chase asks for the name on my account, it's Steven Sailer with an n at the end of Steven. (Non-tax deductible.)
Posts
41 comments:
"Which is more interesting: Bloomberg View or iSteve? "
How can this be answered? It depends on single article basis.
Your posts about "Colleges vs Ivy Leagues" or stuff are somewhat boring, at least from an European point of view. Others are interesting.
The links you reported lead to very short articles, I am not impressed by them.
iSteve and VDare are the more interesting compared to Bloomberg. Steve, your blog is the most dangerous blog I read. Even if Bloomberg was publishing discussions between the greats of our times on important topics, is there any doubt it would be rigorously PC and one more outlet for the predictable conventional wisdom? Most of the web is about as predictable as a Law & Order episode.
Thanks for taking the risk to say what needs to be said on iSteve.
Bloomberg View is just more of the same old same old: to force your view through with money, just like he bought the governor's office. Boring.
I enjoy reading Amity Shlaes; she's really quite good.
Which is more interesting: Bloomberg View or iSteve?
Not sure. But since I probably won't take the time to read it, I'll declare you the winner by default.
I do seem to have an impression of Ezra Klein as a typical knee-jerk idiot liberal; this impression must have formed at some time and for some reason...
Bloomberg view, generally speaking, though on occasion you're amusing.
Why would you invite a comparison that you're bound to come out of looking poor? A full-fledged magazine with plenty of resources behind it and a multitude of famous and/or entertaining writers vs. a lone blogger?
I would rather compare you to your peers, i.e., White Nationalist bloggers. And in that comparison, you come out looking rather well. The antisemitism is muted, one could even say toned down to a level acceptable in polite company. Likewise for the sneers about African-Americans and other minorities.
You could do better, of course. Give up on the notion of preserving white privilege for lazy, not-too-bright Americans of European descent. It's a pipe dream. Can't be done. Even if that is what brings most of your readers here.
You're a good writer, Steve. If you wanted, you could write in the vein of your best pieces that look back wistfully on a bygone era.
Screw the sullen, resentful, whiny hordes of people who come here to find affirmation for their claims of being victimized by Goldberg and Taniqua. You are better than them.
Amity Shlaes: Sexier-n-Hades, but good gawd she has a heart of coal.
What, no article penned by the magazine's namesake calling for restocking Detroit with boatloads of immigrants? Shocking!
Just from the titles, iSteve is more interesting. But Bloomberg is aiming for more influential rather than more interesting, I'd guess.
Yes I don't use the Internet to read this MSM-type of conventional wisdom. I like provocative, counterintuitive stuff. MSM doesn't do that.
No contest. iSteve is far more interesting. Bloomberg is basically unsupported opinion.
Robert Hume
those headlines bore me to tears
Isteve, of course....but wouldn't Bloomberg be really good if Isteve was a regular, and well paid, contributor? I think we know the answer.
Off Topic: Mark Steyn compares white Californians to white Rhodesians. Wow!
http://tinyurl.com/3un2bmr
Shlaes is not totally boring. She was on Econtalk for her book saying FDR prolonged the Depression. I lack the background to really opine on it, but my sense is there's probably something to it.
Krugman, responding to the book, said there is a whole industry of such thoughts operating mostly out of right wing think tanks. I guess his point was that these intellectuals cannot hack it in our free-inquiry, politically-unbiased university academe, so they are forced to sing for their supper of biased partisan lucre.
However, the mag does sound pretty boring next to Sailer.
Your best stuff is way better than this. But "Oil, Islam and Women" is interesting for the unspoken corollary hypothesis that might be applied to the US. A diverse, information based economy leads to more job opportunity for women, as compared to an oil-based economy. Since our big problem in the US is the decline in traditional male jobs, maybe we need some trade barriers to reestablish our manufacturing and extractive sectors.
India's First Gay Prince
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-21/indias-first-gay-prince-prince-manvendra-singh-gohil/
“In India, HIV has been a blessing in disguise,” he said. “HIV gave us a platform to empower ourselves. A lot of my friends are getting infected.”
"Give up on the notion of preserving white privilege for lazy, not-too-bright Americans of European descent."
April unemployment:
8% White
16% Black
12% Hispanic
How lazy can you be while creating the most democratic, free, and powerful country in the world?
How likely is it to continue so with massive low IQ immigration and the simultaneous loss of social capital, vide Robert Putnam?
Robert Hume
that second one about the womens reglious oil wrestling in the workplace looks pretty interesting.
Krugman, responding to the book, said there is a whole industry of such thoughts operating mostly out of right wing think tanks. I guess his point was that these intellectuals cannot hack it in our free-inquiry, politically-unbiased university academe, so they are forced to sing for their supper of biased partisan lucre.
I used to dislike Krugman. Now I just pity him.
The really interesting thing about Bloomberg is that as a globalist he's rather paranoid about any nationalist, closed-border, self-sufficiency types. Some of the articles are OK, however, the psychological dimension might be a Freudian wet dream. He's got all this money and influence yet he's still capable of creating a foofaraw over some backwoods nobody with a non-Ivy degree would prefer "by Americans for Americans" manufacturing. Go figure.
OT - Just in case it might afford Steve or anybody else here a moment's amusement, I've done my best to reply, on Sailer's behalf, to Larry Auster's latest attack on him.
Yeah, I know - total waste of time. But still - I think I made a pretty good job of it.
iSteve is interesting largely by being written from a different persective, with different assumptions and blind spots and such. It's not that the conventional view of the world is especially dumb--it's not, really. It's that anyone who consumes much US media can already understand the conventional US ruling class view of the world fairly well, having had plenty of opportunity to see it.
This is why I like Democracy Now for news, to be honest. It's not like I think they're better at journalism than, say, NPR or Fox. Indeed, they've fewer resources, less access, and probably are at least as ideologically blinded. But their slant and blind spots are *different* from those of the MSM.
The great thing about blogs is that they offer a chance to find genuinely independent voices, written from different assumptions, relationships, etc., than the MSM. Sailer, Greenwald, Sullivan, Balko, Coates, Cowen, among many others, are coming at the world from a different enough perspective that you might learn something from them, rather than simply hearing what the latest justification for the ruling class's Libya policy is, or hearing yet another, ever-so-slightly improved explanation of why affirmative action in education isn't really quite the same thing as legally mandated discrimination in favor of the preferred ethnic group.
"You could do better, of course. Give up on the notion of preserving white privilege for lazy, not-too-bright Americans of European descent. It's a pipe dream. Can't be done. Even if that is what brings most of your readers here."
You're not capable of doing better, of course. Give up on the notion of redistributing white privilege to lazy, not-too-bright Americans of non-European descent. It's a pipe dream. Can't be done. Even if that is what brings most of your ilk here to deny the obvious truth.
"You could do better, of course. Give up on the notion of preserving white privilege for lazy, not-too-bright Americans of European descent. It's a pipe dream. Can't be done."
This is your peak, just before the collapse, same as always.
Haha, get a load of this spin.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-daum-obamaspeak-20110526,0,2181176.column
Obama spin is now scraping the bottom of the barrel. What a Daumass this Meghan is. And I suppose if he farts, it's because his body's filled with excess holiness.
Time-Lapse Map Shows America's Brown Future - http://www.theroot.com/buzz/time-lapse-map-shows-americas-brown-future
iSteve is 27.4 times more interesting than Bloomer View. This is because iSteve talks about race. As a Pomo Victorian, I think only about race, for the same reason real Victorians only cared about sex: it is forbidden to speak honestly about them.
Let's try being Double Victorians.
Say, shouldn't your piano be wearing pantaloons? Its limbs are unclothed. An African-American scholar or a vibrant youth might see those limbs and think something unmentionable. Worse still, what if a white male oppressor were to see those limbs and commit a hate crime against a disadvantaged minority?
Oh, and an evil white male might say your piano wants to be ravished.
That was fun.
"The really interesting thing about Bloomberg is that as a globalist he's rather paranoid about any nationalist, closed-border, self-sufficiency types."
This is why Texas should pay all its Mexican immigrants to go live in NY.
Put up signs all over the SW and the Deep South.
"NY, A LIBERAL PARADISE THAT OFFERS FREE EVERYTHING TO BLACKS AND IMMIGRANTS. GO NOW AND GRAB YOUR SLICE OF BIG APPLE."
What Sailer's blog needs is more bells and whistles. A cooler format, more images, more video, etc. More razzle dazzle.
Is this *View* part of Mikey B.'s *Business Week*? I can't tell if it is or not.
The inneresting question is, "How profitable will *Bloomberg Business Week* be, longer term?
One suspects that B-Berg B-Week, at least the print version thereof, will be a money loser which won't stay afloat unless Mikey B. subsidizes it.
A vanity press publication similar to Mortimer Zuckerman's *U. S. News and World Report,* that's probably *Bloomberg Business Week*'s future.
Too bad, so sad.
norway gets the most money from oil of any nation, and women work there.
Steve Burton said..."...I've done my best to reply, on Sailer's behalf, to Larry Auster's latest attack on him.
Yeah, I know - total waste of time. But still - I think I made a pretty good job of it."
I think you made a pretty good job of it, too.
But I admit I prefer Steve Sailer's oracular silence in [non]response to his critics--including me, when I accuse him of being too nice.
In particular, the way Steve takes the high road, in serene and apparently sincere indifference to Auster's spluttering and sniping, really tickles me.
Steve, all your output was preceded by Cipolla, the Italian historian
http://www.searchlores.org/realicra/basiclawsofhumanstupidity.htm
Of course he used to live in SoCal.
iSteve beats it hands down, even if BV gets better with time than this maiden issue. Despite the disparity in resources, Steve has the ultimate "nuke", i.e. the freedom to opine freely on sensitive issues. Its like a breath of oxygen going from the MSM (and BV is probably a platform for Bloomberg to launch a future presidential bid and is hardly going to be a hotbed of non-PC views) to a forum where race, culture and politics can be discussed in an honest, clear-eyed manner.
Another thing iSteve has going for it is that over time it has built up an "ecotope" of regular commenters who are as informative and entertaining as the regular articles itself. It remains to be seen how "liberal" Komment Kontrol will be at BV.
Lastly, residing in Europe, I've noticed quite a few commenters labeling iSteve as an edgy, dangerous blog that one should never own up to following (pace Steve's efforts in setting up anonymous Twitter followers). Have things really come to this pass in the US?
Have things really come to this pass in the US?
Yes. A mere admission of regularly reading iSteve will earn you a racist label and automatically disqualify you from a lot of jobs.
My eyes glazed over at the TITLES in Bloomberg.
Still, professional sports bore my profoundly, and now that my last kid's admitted to college (Cal Poly SLO, a bargain), some of your topics are "meh."
I like your stuff on HBD, immigration, race und so weiter.
April unemployment:
8% White
And all of them are on iSteve :)
"And all of them are on iSteve :)"
LOL, how the hell could I have missed that one?
You like humor, Truth?
O.K., I give you humor.... http://whitewhine.com/
10 times the fun of isteve and twice the heartburn for his readers! But since you all have your Maalox always ready, no problem, right?
Post a Comment