November 8, 2012

Pot Calls Kettle White - Newsweek headlines "GOP: You're Old, You're White, You're History!"


From Wikipedia's entry on "Newsweek:"
The revenue declines prompted an August 2010 sale by owner The Washington Post Company to 92-year-old audio pioneer Sidney Harman—for a purchase price of $1.00 and an assumption of the magazine's liabilities. Editor Jon Meacham left the magazine after the sale. 
In November 2010 Newsweek merged with the news and opinion website The Daily Beast, forming the Newsweek Daily Beast Company, after negotiations between the owners of both publications. Tina Brown, The Daily Beast's editor-in-chief has since served as the editor of both publications. Newsweek is jointly owned by the estate of the late Harman and the diversified American Internet company IAC. 
On October 18, 2012, Brown announced that Newsweek would cease print publication with the December 31, 2012 issue and transition to an all-digital format, to be called Newsweek Global.

91 comments:

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

Are they pushing for a race war? Seriously?

Anonymous said...

will you admit that newsweek is part of a large corporation which is owned in the most part by rich people. And it is operated by rich people. And the same goes for all those other media titans such as NY Times, us news, CNN, etc. Rich people control the spigot of ideas and ideology in the media, in america.

Same goes for hollywood.

What you see in that newsweek cover is what RICH PEOPLE wanted to put there. They OWN the media.

So, logic tells us that multiculti, political correctness, race spoils, white-race-guilting, mass immigration, etc, are all things that rich people want. And guess what? Rich people, like other people, generally act in their own best interests.

So when are you and all the other conservatives going to admit that this so-called "liberal" pantheon of race and PC and immigration etc is in place primarily for the benefit of the rich??

Admit it. Come on, don't be a hypocrite. I want some conservative somewhere to put up a blog post or an article title or speak this sentence on Fox News: "political correctness, multiculti, mass immigration, immigrant-worship, anti-white hatred etc all exist because the rich people want them to exist."

This is obvious.

But when are you going to admit it?

Apollo said...

This is the same Newsweek that ~10 weeks ago told Obama to 'hit the road' and wrote about how he was through?

They'll put out anything to swing with the current vibe...

Anonymous said...

I am really really really baffled by whites who behave like this and welcome this.. are they really this stupid??

Anonymous said...

So you are actually pretending that the mass media is not in general part of large corporate entities, which are in general owned in large part by the rich? Talk about disingenuous!

From wikipedia:
====
Sidney Harman (August 4, 1918 – April 12, 2011) was an American businessman active in education, government, industry, and publishing. He was the Chairman Emeritus of Harman International Industries, Inc. Harman served as the U.S. Under Secretary of Commerce in 1977 and 1978.

===
Oh, he's small time, all right!
====


As of August 2010 Harman was also the publisher of Newsweek.

Harman was married to Jane Harman (born 1945), a former Democratic member of Congress from California who represented California's 36th congressional district which included the Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach areas of Southern California.
====

One of the rich and connected!

====
The University of Southern California Lloyd Greif Center for Entrepreneurial Studies named Harman the "Entrepreneur of the Year 2007."
====

ah, an entrepreneur. Typical of them to push PC multiculti propaganda.


=====
In August 2010, Harman bought Newsweek magazine from the Washington Post Company.[1]
He paid $1 and accepted the assumption of $47 million in liabilities.

====

47 mill in liabilities.

TRANSLATION: this guy is loaded. And he loves pushing race-guilt, anti-white hatred, PC, mass immigration, and the rest of the pantheon of pseudoLeftism.

Yes, the mass media is going broke, in part because of the internet, and in part because some americans are waking up to the media as a conduit of elite-friendly, anti-worker ideology, such as PC multiculti, immigrant-worship etc.

Once again, we see that pseudoLeftism is a tool of the rich. Admit it. I want one single conservative somewhere in america, after all these years, to admit that. And I would like to see a liberal admit it, too. Because liberals are just as big of drones/propaganda-receptacles and hypocrites as conservatives.

youngreact said...

A general comment Steve:

Why aren't you mad?

I know you've adopted this sort of bemused detachment, perhaps as a means of maintaining some journalistic dispassion, but come on.

The media has re-elected a historically dangerous man to lead this country, implicitly (and explicitly) running on the "white men are evil" canard to do so. Doesn't this get you rattled just a little?

Anonymous said...

What is there to say?
This election has torn the veil aside, and we now see, as never before, the tensions, antagonisms, and contradictions of the American populace?

"As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding. Like the Roman, I seem to see 'the River Tiber foaming with much blood'. That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the 20th century. Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now."

Anonymous said...

I'm bewildered as to why the question is always "How can America or the GOP get more hispanic votes" while the logical "does it make sense for America to be more Hispanic?" is completely unthinkable.

I was talking with SWPL Obama voters yesterday and I neutrally said that I don't like what's happening with immigration. All of them basically said "Obama tried to do something about that, but was blocked" It's like we're on different planets.

Mr Lomez said...

This post-election vitriol against white men has been pretty astounding. I don't remember this kind of smug, even hostile, reaction in '08. Is this a short-term sentiment, or will this divisiveness settle out? Hard to know. For how long can SWPL's hate themselves?

In any case, give credit to the Libs for their monopoly on all things race. In our national discourse, racial politics for the left is not only sanctioned but considered enlightened. Racial politics on the right is considered hate speech. When every college freshman for two decades is taught that all the world's problems can be traced back to the "white male patriarchy," this is what you get.

Hail said...

SBPDL wrote:
"Are they pushing for a race war? Seriously?"

There has been such a war ongoing for quite some time now, of course.

Whites have been 'ethnically-cleansed' out of their neighborhoods for nearly 60 years. And now, even a comfortable and decisive 3-to-2 victory among Whites is not enough to elect the president, given a Nonwhite/Antiwhite-Voting-Bloc of 30% of the voting-pool that gives a 5-to-1 margin for any Nonwhite Democrat.


Ultimately, some form of "partition" of the USA is likely. Odds on survival of the entity of the political entity of the 'USA' till 2050? 2100?

map said...

Anonymous is right. Pseudoleftism is a tool of the rich just as Marxism is a tool of the rich. I am not kidding.

Marxism, Leftism, pseudoleftism: a tools designed by rich people to use the poor to destroy the middle class because the mc is their greatest enemy.

Anonymous said...

Shades of General Toussaint L'Ouverture.

Anonymous said...

Mr Lomez said...

In our national discourse, racial politics for the left is not only sanctioned but considered enlightened. Racial politics on the right is considered hate speech.

===========

Correct. But why such a superficial analysis by you?

WHO cries 'hate speech' if a GOP politician or talking head delves into race? The mass media does, that is who. The mass media are in general part of large corporations whose shares are owned largely by rich investors, and the mass media is managed by multimillionaire executives.

People in general act in their own best interests.

The rich have their hands on the spigots of mass media information flow.

If the mass media demonizes the GOP when the GOP dares to venture into racial politics, you had better believe that such demonization protects the interests of the rich.

Why does this obvious truth NEVER come up in any discussion anywhere?? EVER!!

Anonymous said...

I want some conservative somewhere to put up a blog post or an article title or speak this sentence on Fox News: "political correctness, multiculti, mass immigration, immigrant-worship, anti-white hatred etc all exist because the rich people want them to exist."

I think you must be new here.

I think you are very confused about what might be considered a 'conservative'. Of course admitting those things would cause all sorts of cognitive dissonance for a certain brand of conservative, the globalizing, neo-con, RINO types. But you wont find them here.

As for your demand - I dont know that Steve has ever specifically 'admitted' those things but they are pretty much common currency at isteve.

I would ask liberals to admit that most of what is regarded as sticking-it-to-the-man, transgressive, progressive, leftist boilerplate is actually stuff these rich types want.

Porter said...

Liberals a generation ago: Non-whites are just like you. It's insane paranoia to think they pose any threat whatsoever. Nope, they're just here to work hard and be your loyal friends.

Liberals now: You lost white man...game over! Now go crawl into the corner and die. hahahaha.

Liberals a generation from now: Hello 911? Help please. Our power has been out for days and a gang of disadvantaged youths has kicked in our door and shot my husband and now they're looking for me... I'm so scared! Is anyone there??

No habla Ingles...Ese. hahahahaha

Anonymous said...

map said...
Anonymous is right. Pseudoleftism is a tool of the rich just as Marxism is a tool of the rich. I am not kidding.

Marxism, Leftism, pseudoleftism: a tools designed by rich people to use the poor to destroy the middle class because the mc is their greatest enemy.

==================

Well, marxism has never actually existed anywhere in the real world, but only in written form. It was never implemented. And the various written explanations of marxism never dealt with the real world concepts of community and unity of the populace. It was all theoretical and poorly worked out. Red China and the Soviet Union were never marxist. They SAID they were marxist.

But collectivism only works successfully in direct proportion to the unity of the populace. That sentence right there represents the culmination of my 55 years of learning, and, to my knowledge, I am the only person to ever write that sentence.

Anyhoo....Red China and the soviet were not/are not unified. And they were not designed to be. therefore not collectivist and not marxist. You can cite the lack of private property etc. The fact is that those regimes were run for the benefit of those at the top. That ain't collectivist, and therefore not marxist. You can call it collectivist. But you would be wrong.


The small nations of nordic western europe are the closest nations ever to an implementation of marxism. And before the rich people started cramming nonwhite immigration down their throats, those nations were the best ever in the history of the world.

Anonymous said...

"So when are you and all the other conservatives going to admit that this so-called "liberal" pantheon of race and PC and immigration etc is in place primarily for the benefit of the rich??"

I think Steve knows the elites (ie rich and powerful) are progs. they will be until their riches and their status is in danger.

The most affluent zip codes voted blue.

We knew this.

It's a psychological problem.

Anonymous said...

Incredible. Sailer Sr. passed away this year. He worked hard all his life and contributed to the building of modern America. American power, progress, and prosperity in the 20th century owes much to such men. Without their contributions, there wouldn't have been the modern America in which all other groups could prosper.

Old people deserve honor and respect in their sunset yrs. But Newsweek runs a cover that pretty much says 'drop dead like flies you old white scum so we can spit on your grave.'
It's one sure way to encourage hedonistic young whites to hate old whites. Instead of gratitude toward old whites, it's contempt and hatred.

Who knew that such hatred and venom lay in the hearts of the liberal elites who run the media?

Anonymoose said...

"I am really really really baffled by whites who behave like this and welcome this.. are they really this stupid??"

Though it is unconscious, a lot of liberal whites simply picture the "white establishment" as caricatures of their high school bullies. Meanwhile they see themselves as the underdog hero leading all kinds in harmony to defeat the "bully." Watch any movie from teen flicks to sci fi and this concept is played out.

Their feelings are going to look pretty silly when demographics change. As whites living in diverse areas know, the new black and hispanic bullies which steal mug and harass whites are a much bigger handful than the snooty preps white liberals picture as their eternal nemesis.

Anonymous said...

I like Mark Levin's suggestion that we demand that 3 million people from former Iron Curtain countries be admitted to the US NOW because after all, we need the labor force.

Professor Woland said...

The last time I read Newsweek I was waiting for my wife in the lobby of her doctor's office while she had a prenatal exam. It was basically an advertisement with some news content mixed in to disguise it as a magazine. 50% of the advertisements were from Pharmaceutical companies pushing brand name drugs to post menopausal women or high mark up retail items that nobody needs. When Noam Chomsky wrote Manufacturing Consent he basically placed all the blame on the evil corporations. If he did a rewrite, he would need to go one step further and point out that they are only interested in catering to women seeing as they make 85% of all the discretionary purchases. In my family it is probably even higher. I was able to skim through it about 15 minutes and when I was finished I had felt as if I had lowered my IQ by about 10 points.

Anonymous said...

There's something wrong with this picture. Newsweek gloats about the fall of old white America, but old folks already lived their lives and pretty good ones in the 20th century. They have little to worry about since what soon awaits them is the afterlife.

The people who should really be worried are not old whites but young whites. In an increasingly browning country, young whites will have to compete and work harder not only to pay for boomer retirement benefits but to pay for more social services for immigrants of color from the Third World and their children and relatives. And young whites will have to suffer from more affirmative action and disparate impact that will favor non-whites over them.

SWPL: You're young, you're white, and you're fuc*ed.

Mr Lomez said...

"The mass media are in general part of large corporations whose shares are owned largely by rich investors, and the mass media is managed by multimillionaire executives."

Sure, follow the money...But to suggest that the race double-standard is all a conspiracy of the rich is, like all conspiracy theories, hard to take seriously.

The fact is, a lot of upper middle-class whites can feel awfully good about themselves for voting for Obama and what he represents without ever having to see the consequences (at least not yet). It's easy to support immigration when the only immigrants you know/see are your landscapers.

This is not about controlling the masses. This is about assuaging guilt.

David said...

>Why aren't you mad?<

Speaking for myself, I'm mad, but a. this stuff has been trending for a long time; b. one can do only so much, i.e., no one is obligated or able to save the world, and c. there is a difference between being mad and being stupid.

Wotta ya want us to DO? Spew obscenities (and mebbe some racial slurs) on a blog in a drunken hissy fit? Maybe it would scratch a self-destructive itch - like tossing oneself off a high bridge for the sheer thrill of the fall - but what would it accomplish, really?

There are only three ways to change any undesirable social policy.

1. By politics (vote, run for office)
2. By opinion-making (write, go on TV)
3. If all institutions fail and one accepts the likely risk of being imprisoned or shot to bloody ribbons, armed revolution.

It is too early for 3, the hissy fits of drama queens notwithstanding.

The quality of opinion-making seems to be improving, and opinion-distribution is vastly better (because of the internet).

The real problem area, at present, is politics. It's true that some attempts have been made. From the "right," the Tea Party. From the "left," the (pathetic) Occupy Movement. Both were scatterbrained to different degrees and therefore failed. (The Teas got some people into office, but who knows what they will accomplish there - the restoration of constitutional freedoms, or the continuation of dribble about "legitimate rape" and what God told 'em in a dream?) Kevin MacDonald has the rather goofy and anti-Semitic American Third Party, but it's...well, it is what it is. The Libertarian Party is full of problems as well. The Tea Party probably queered Mitt's chance to seem convincing as a normal person to most normal people, despite his good aesthetics, so count out the Republicans for a while. And the Democrats are the default party for decline.

If you're mad for more than a moment, consider political action. For example, switch your career to politics if it excites your energies and you think it's viable.

I didn't mention the other option for social change, which is unfairly denigrated as "the coward's option." No, not blowing your brains out - but voting with your feet. In this option, you forget about society yourself, and protect you and any loved ones you have, by moving to a different area/country/government. The social effect of this path is less direct than that of politics, revolution, or even opinion-making, but it adds up, though you won't receive the benefits of the social effect. You will have split.

Ivan said...

Wasn't the Republican Party formed to oppose the spread of slavery? Oh well. No good deed goes unpunished.

Ivan said...

Wasn't the Republican Party formed to oppose the spread of slavery? Oh well. No good deed goes unpunished.

Professor Woland said...

If the demographics are looking grim for white conservatives, they will be absolutely dire for white liberals. You know, the people who forgot how to replicate themselves. Their numbers will dwindle to a rump. Eventually, the only ones left will be the one or two that are allowed to appear on television claiming to represent the other 200 million white people still left in America.

Truth said...

ATTENTION GUYS, ONLY THREE DAYS AFTER THE ELECTION, INDISPUTABLE PROOF OBAMA WAS BORN IN KENYA*


Truth said...

*(Unfortunately, so was Romney.)

Nuel said...

"If the demographics are looking grim for white conservatives, they will be absolutely dire for white liberals. You know, the people who forgot how to replicate themselves. Their numbers will dwindle to a rump."

The problem with this line of logic is that they are Priests in the Church of Obama- they pull a new round of recruits from the ranks each generation. And given the ever-increasing emphasis on liberal brainwashing there will be no shortage of recruits for the foreseeable future. Apparently based on some reports, it needs to start even with infants, as they are racists already [but it can't be a genetic predisposition towards preference for one's own in everyone because that would be racist to claim].

bla-bla said...

"Shades of General Toussaint L'Ouverture"

When I first saw the picture, I was thinking the same: this is Monsieur Haiti himself.

Anonymous said...

"*(Unfortunately, so was Romney.)"

rotfl.

If she had triplets, would the third one been named Gary Johnson?

Anonymous said...

There is a simple way to fix this problem. White conservatives should have lots of kids. I say set up a white conservative dating site.

If you're a white conservative guy who can't find a nice white girl, go get a rural latina who's whitish enough. She'll be adoring and loyal, and she would be happy to have the kid be raised as 'white'.
Another major place for decent chicks is Central Asia such as Uzbekistan and neighboring states. The women are Eurasianish, but if mixed with white guy's genes, the kid will be mostly white.

Of course, it's best to find a white girl, but if you can't, you gotta do the next best thing. And have at least 4 kids. And save money and spend on raising kids.

Eventually, there will be plenty of white conservatives.

Anonymous said...

They should do variations on the conquering dude pic.

Obama as Caesar.

Obama as Mao.

Obama as Hitler.

Obama as Stalin.

Obama as Genghis Khan.

Obama as Alex the Grape.

Obama as Darth Vader.

Obama as Attila.

Obama as Shaka Zulu.

Obama as Hideoyoshi.

Obama as Ivan the Terrible.

Matthew said...

"Ultimately, some form of 'partition' of the USA is likely."

If it really comes to that, we will not be partitioning this country - we will be taking it back.

It amazed me these people come here only to bitch about being the minority in the new country when they could've stayed in the wonderful old country and remained part of the majority.

Of course, that's not why they came - they came to live off the patrimony of the people who made it so great. They came to steal from us.

"Of course, it's best to find a white girl, but if you can't"

If you can't? Where the hell do you live, Alaska? Where I live attractive, single white girls looking for commitment are all around - everywhere. If you're not pretty enough for them then jog for a few weeks and bench a couple of sets and try again. Really, it ain't that hard. Get off your fat ass, stop looking at pr0n, stop looking for an easy lay and find someone you can care about, then have 3-4 kids.

Matthew said...

Obama has two options at this point:

1) He lead us over the fiscal cliff (tax increases, spending cuts), essentially guaranteeing the economy won't grow for at least 2 more years (while the population continues to do so).

2) Ignore the deficit, keep spending spending spending, and watch the credit card get yanked late in his second term, and everything really implodes.

I'm guessing he goes with #2.

Anonymous said...

Here's the future of California:

http://api.cde.ca.gov/Acnt2012/2012GrthStAPI.aspx?allcds=

26% white
52% hispanic
6% black
16% non-white

Silver said...

Correct. But why such a superficial analysis by you?

WHO cries 'hate speech' if a GOP politician or talking head delves into race? The mass media does, that is who. The mass media are in general part of large corporations whose shares are owned largely by rich investors, and the mass media is managed by multimillionaire executives.


Lol, talk about superficial analysis!

Who runs public education, champ?

Anonymous said...

Mr Lomez said...

"The mass media are in general part of large corporations whose shares are owned largely by rich investors, and the mass media is managed by multimillionaire executives."

Sure, follow the money...But to suggest that the race double-standard is all a conspiracy of the rich is, like all conspiracy theories, hard to take seriously.



--------------

that comment is very typical of the so called politically aware america---as soon as someone suggests that rich people might actually act in their own best interests, out comes the 'conspiracy theorist' charge.

The defacto definition of conspiracy theorist in america is someone who thinks that rich people are not god's gift to americans and that rich people actually act in their own best interests. Imagine that!

ben tillman said...

So when are you and all the other conservatives going to admit that this so-called "liberal" pantheon of race and PC and immigration etc is in place primarily for the benefit of the rich??

We know that PC and immigration are policies foisted on us by the rich. And?

Anonymous said...

"If the demographics are looking grim for white conservatives, they will be absolutely dire for white liberals. You know, the people who forgot how to replicate themselves. Their numbers will dwindle to a rump. Eventually, the only ones left will be the one or two that are allowed to appear on television claiming to represent the other 200 million white people still left in America. "

Nope.

White liberals don't need to breed if they can convert the children produced by White conservatives. And they are good at converting them, so far.

They do after all control the media, the schools and the culture.

Anonymous said...

26% white
52% hispanic
6% black
16% non-white

Better brown than black I say.

I wonder if Jews did a brilliant thing in using Obama. Jews pretty used 'diversity' to make browns the biggest minority. Before Jews got around to electing a new majority, they got around to electing a new minority. Surely, many blacks were angry about this as blacks had historically been the biggest minority in US history. Blacks didn't like immigration at all.

So, blacks were bound to be angry with Jews... but then Jews made obama president, and that made blacks feel good. And since Hispanics voted for Obama in such huge numbers, blacks have come to see the rise in Hispanic numbers as ensuring Democratic victory which means more goodies for blacks.

Without rise of Hispanics, GOP would have remained a strong force in American elections, especially if more whites move to the GOP. Jews, white urban liberals, and blacks alone cannot win national elections. They need browns, especially in the taking of California, the biggest prize of all.

I wonder if neocons colluded with liberal Jews in this. Neocons came to the GOP and persuaded people like Karl Rove that Hispanics will be future Republicans, and so many goppers bought it. But Mexicanization of California meant it going to the Democratic column.
California did try to stem Mexican immigration, but Supreme Court knocked down its measure. Neocons planted a poison seed in the GOP, and it pleased liberal Jews who saw CA go over to Democrats.

-------

Without affirmative action for browns and the ideology of anti-white multi-culturalism, would more Hispanics have gone for the GOP?
The current education and culture encourage Hispanics to hate whites. And current government encourages browns to get more goodies by being non-white. There are incentives to be anti-white, anti-GOP. Also, liberal media and Hollywood openly and brazenly encourage browns to be tribally hostile toward whites. Rage groups like La Raza are allowed to play mainstream politics. Colleges have Che Guevara-worshiping brown centers that encourage hatred of whites/gringos. Movies like MACHETE do to Anglos what INGLORIOUS BASTERDS did to Germans. As far as many browns are concerned, Anglos are Nazis.. and liberal Jews encourage such hatred.

But suppose such culture and policies didn't exist. Would many browns be Republican for whatever reasons? Many conservatives aren't necessarily rich. Many poor whites vote Republican because they see it as the patriotic anti-liberal party. Without the rise of multiculturalism, I wonder if many browns would be pro-GOP.

It's like without the ideology of feminism, many more white women would be conservative.

snapperhead soup said...

Many cons now say that Hispanics vote for Democrats mainly for economic reasons, and that is certainly important. But since the late 80s, the new PC regimen and multiculturalism have worked hard from kindergarten to college to instill non-whites with burning hatred of 'privileged' whites.

After all, Asians are makers than takers in the economy, but even more of them went for Obama. So, it can't be just economic. It's ideological.
Multiculturalism was never about culture. That was just a cover to push radical politics. The message was all 'people of color' should unite to hate whites, or at least conservative whites. Liberal whites would serve as conscientious enablers of the 'people of color' and keep their privileges in the new order.

Anonymous said...

Liberal Jews accuse conservatives of 'hatred' and 'intolerance', but the real hatred is to be found in groups like La Raza, SPLC, ADL, gay groups, Rap culture, and Asian organizations.

Obama calls for revenge and they all cheer. Whites as model majority must play nice but minorities can fume and seethe all they want.

Libs fume about the evil Willy Horton ad but Obama portrays Romney as murderer of some woman in an ad. That is okay and not over the top.

Anonymous said...

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57456481-503544/asian-americans-a-fast-growing-group-in-key-states-/

Will this economically save America? With all these high IQ hard working Asian drones coming here, will they pay the taxes to pay for retired boomers and black government workers?

Not good for GOP though.

Anonymous said...

Conservatives focus on elections, but maybe elections aren't as important as other factors in the game of power. After all, there's never been a Jewish president, but Jews are the most powerful people in America. Bush the Christian Wasp won twice, but Christian wasp power was slipping throughout the 2000s.
The Obama presidency hasn't really done much for blacks. Indeed, gays got more out of it--and there's never been a gay president either.

So, your kind doesn't have to win elections to gain the power or wield influence; after all, politicians are bought, groomed, and controlled by those with money and clout. Rich Gays have great deal of power.

Conservatives fixate on elections because they've been so weak in many areas of power.
Conservatives had been losing the academic, intellectual, and culture war forever. Universities are dominated by liberals. Hollywood and pop culture are owned by libs. So is high culture. Media are dominated by liberals.

You'd think conservatives, being so pro-business, would be better than libs at least in making money, but even this isn't true. Though the 80s were known as the Reagan conservative decade, the kind of people who made the greatest economic gain were urban and suburban liberals. This was when young boomers Gates, Jobs, Lucas, Spielberg, and many others were coming into their own. They were building massive empires and they were all liberal. And computers is the future, and it's completely dominated by liberals. So, libs even win in the business or money war.

This is why the 2012 election is so crushing. Cons, having lost in culture, media, ideas, and economics, at least hoped for the white house. (Of course, most of government bureaucracy is run by libs too). Big government or big business, it's libs and libs. Starbucks is liberal. Apple is liberal. Facebook is liberal. All future hightech economies are run by liberals who are very hard working.

There is so much talk of old white males in the GOP. But the problem is white mediocre males. Even if GOP fails to win elections, it can wield great power and influence in many fields such as media and academia if it had lots of talents--like gays do. But cons don't even have that. Con culture is Rush sitting on his fat ass and spouting crap on talk radio.

My head hurts. Not that I'm any better. I guess I'm part of the rightwing mediocrity too. Well, that's us alright. Cons are white Mexicans. Not exactly idiocracy but mediocracy.

Anonymous said...

Go Bain, No Gain.

David said...

About the Newsweek cover:

Will that be the last cover? A fitting "bang" ending to that dreadful mag that frequently enraged me during my teens and twenties.

Imagine showing that cover to people 20 years ago. They would have thought it was a "vile" "racist" "KKK" parody of racial integration. Not safe for work.

It reminds me of R. Crumb's ("Keep on Truckin'") classic cartoon "When the G-d Damn N---s Take Over America!" Specifically the panel where the African-American king is being carried around on a litter while spewing insults at his white slaves and concubines. I mean, get a load of that suit.

The lunacy and hatred behind Newsweek were always apparent, at least to some people. And now they are apparent to everyone.

Anonymous said...

Go Bain, No Gain.

Ive asked this before - are these one-liners the work of a lone comic genius or is everybody having a go from time to time.

stari_momak said...

"
I am really really really baffled by whites who behave like this and welcome this.. are they really this stupid??"

Second that. I try to tell my relatives that live in Oregon and Washington, who left Calfornia -- 'you think this is gonna stop' at the state border. But no, a good many of them vote Democrat. It's insane.

fnn said...

There is a simple way to fix this problem. White conservatives should have lots of kids. I say set up a white conservative dating site.

As someone probably pointed out already, as long as the left controls the culture, education and govt they will convert most of your children to leftism.

Richard Brown said...

As a Brit I would like to thank America. We know know: non-white ethnic will vote for and support other ethnics against whites wherever they are.

Cameron's Conservatives should have got a landslide in the last UK General Election but he did not even win a majority because while people were sick to death of Labour they realised that he, like Romney, was not a real Conservative.

Luckily for us our non-White ethnic populations are only a fraction of yours so we can stop them in their tracks.
Racial politics will become mainstream.
Both the Labour Party and the Tory party could be swept aside.

Thank you

Anonymous said...

As Makovec was finishing her report, police said, five men rushed up and grabbed a $6,000 camera from the tripod. Viewers saw the live picture being jarred and turned sideways for about two seconds.

One of the assailants punched Welk in the mouth before the group fled in a Mercedes-Benz, which apparently was accompanied by a Lexus, police said...

The incident comes amid a series of robberies in which the news media have been victims throughout Oakland, often in broad daylight.

Veteran Oakland Tribune photographer Laura Oda has twice been robbed of cameras since July.

Late one night in June, a KTVU news crew was robbed of a computer, camera and tripod by several men who pushed their way into their van parked on Redwood Road in the Oakland hills.

In May, a man stole a camera and tripod from a KNTV crew at 20th Street and San Pablo Avenue.


For the crooks, some of this stuff might have some resale value [pawnshops, Craigslist, eBay, etc], but the specialized stuff is going to be almost impossible to fence [simply because it's so rare and so easy to trace].

Instead, I'm thinking that they want this stuff so as to be able to shoot [-er- "film"] their own porno videos.

Anonymous said...

Sorry - posted that on the wrong thread.

Anonymous said...

The problem with this line of logic is that they are Priests in the Church of Obama- they pull a new round of recruits from the ranks each generation. And given the ever-increasing emphasis on liberal brainwashing there will be no shortage of recruits for the foreseeable future.

You're on an HBD site and you don't understand how genetics works? This phenomenon has been going on at least a couple generations now, that's enough time to start having some tangible effect.

And once things are pushed to the limit, there is always a natural spring back. Homeschooling, parental choice of non-PC media, the natural contempt bred from familiarity with the other that can not help but spring from increased immigration, stronger genetic desires to breed intraracially as defectors defect - things are changing.

But much like the Soviet Union even just before it imploded, some things seem like they are going to last forever. They don't.

Anonymous said...

"Luckily for us our non-White ethnic populations are only a fraction of yours so we can stop them in their tracks.
Racial politics will become mainstream."

This. I've been an early adopter at pretty much everything else in life, it seems only natural that this will extend to racial politics. It's definitely going mainstream.

Anonymous said...

This is unbelievable. When have we ever hard the mainstream media speak so openly about race?

This new democrat talking point may be the spark that sets off a wider acceptance of HBD and race realism in the GOP. Obviously the GOP are going to have to respond to all this talk about race. The question is: How will they do it?

Zachary Latif said...

Irony is of course is that the headline was probably written by a white man.

It's interesting though that the war is waged on "white men" even though white women also supported Romney (http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/11/why-white-women-voted-for-romney.html).

There's a study out that "homogenous" Britain is in fact far more mobile than multi-cultural US. http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/~bowles/RulingClass.pdf

(4) The extraordinarily complete long run mobility of England is likely typical of
other western European societies. But other countries, in contrast, do exhibit
persistent social classes over hundreds of years. In the US, for example, the Black
population has persisted at the bottom of the social order, and the Jewish population
at the top. In Chile surname evidence shows the indigenous population has
remained at the bottom since the Spanish conquest of 1541.


As the case of Mitt Romney shows if you Dare to Dream and Win the American Dream; no way in hell should you even consider running for US President (what happened to rewarding and awarding success in life; built hard earned wealth, good Christian values, loving stable family, rare happy long marriage to a high school sweet heart).

tis a Brave New World once the white liberal drives the white man extinct; yet again WASPS set a new global precedent. This time the first in racial or special history to celebrating their own extinction.

Much as well-meaning caste quotas revved caste back in Indian life; white liberalism have managed to inject communatarianism/tribalism in a US that was meant to abolish all that. I'm disgusted by the way non-WASP Romney supports were vilified; case in point Stacey Dash, a single black working mom who believes in the US (and is a case of point of a citizenist).

I would love to see the end of racial politics and racial identity but the liberal left will never ever let that be so long as there a few good (white) men left.

By the way I'm British Pakistani but I'm sad to see the abandonment of noblesse obligee and core social aspirational values that have long been the mainstay of the Anglosphere Commonwealth (which is why they led the world for so many centuries).

neil craig said...

NewsWEEK DAILY Beast

One would have thought they could come up with a better name.

Perhaps not. When Cunard and Air Lingus tried the deal fell though for that reason.

johnomd said...

If one assumes Cuban voting in the 70/80's as an upper limit on the inroads Republicans can make with Hispanics, then the absolute limit they can ever hope for is high 60's support. That would be with the following: A common uniting external foe (Castro), the sense of an active betrayal by the Dems (lack of air support for Bay of Pigs), and a demographic drawn from the upper and middle classes more naturally sympathetic to Republican beliefs and values, and then essentially full on pandering/veto policy of all policies Cuban for the 20-30 years preceding. None of those apply to other Hispanic Immigrants but if it did, it would have increased Romney's share by ~0.3% and Obama down by 0.3%, or a 0.6% swing. In comparison,increasing white turnout by 1% (or depressing with Affirmative action/amnesty sops that dispirit some fraction of whites electorate) would have added or removed 0.72% (72% electorate times 0.01). Even better, actively drawing over an additional 1% of white voters from Obama would have yielded a 1.44% swing. Even if the percentage of the Hispanic voter turnout doubles in the next 20 years from 10 to 20 percent, the magnitude is not that much changed, not that Republicans should hasten it along by granting a path to citizenship for a currently democratic demographic.

ouboet said...

American whites pounded whites in Apartheid South Africa and Rhodesia. Now they get a taste of their own medicine. Our old homelands are long destroyed by the very forces now attacking the US and Europe. For us it's an old story which brings bag many sad memories, and a longing for a place once called home. Many of us white Southern Africans have become modern nomads; we roam the world for jobs at sea, in war and in the office. Sad days, but the worst is over for us and we can now see that we were just ahead of the curve.

neil craig said...

"Southern Africans have become modern nomads; we roam the world"

Or further.

Olon Musk was South Africa born. To be proud of.

Anonymous said...

Ironically, the comments from this Russian professor may ultimately end up being close to correct....

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123051100709638419.html

PaleRider1861 said...

ouboet ... as an unreconstructed Southerner (I do NOT apologize for the existence of the Old South), I have always sided with the Boers in their fight against communism.

It is an indication of just how leftist the media has become when one saw how they hammered apartheid policy in S.A. every day until capitulation to the ANC, then have since remained quiet on the thousands of murders of white farmers and their families by black savages!

Your comments are telling, however, since my side lost the War of Northern Aggression in 1865, we in the South have been living as a conquered country ever since.

Anonymous said...

'I am really really really baffled by whites who behave like this and welcome this.. are they really this stupid??'

To Jews and lib whites, gop is nazi-lite.

Kylie said...

"Are they pushing for a race war? Seriously?"

No. They can't even imagine that those they despise so vehemently would ever get up on their hind legs and fight back.

And for the time being, it seems, they are right.

Anonymous said...


"The people who should really be worried are not old whites but young whites. In an increasingly browning country, young whites will have to compete and work harder not only to pay for boomer retirement benefits but to pay for more social services for immigrants of color from the Third World and their children and relatives. And young whites will have to suffer from more affirmative action and disparate impact that will favor non-whites over them. "

Exactly. It makes me mad when I think of how the Baby Boomer whites (and Gen X too, maybe) essentially sold out their own children. Even "conservative" baby boomers shut down when you bring up the race issue. However uber-liberal young people are racially aware, even if they vote against their own interests. Perhaps the reason some young whites go liberal is because they know who the ruling party is, and they want to be ahead of the curve. In any case, people my age are pretty screwed. At least I am used to diversity already though, so I'll be able to handle what's coming in my middle age better than my cohort from Minnesota or Ohio.

Anonymous said...

Big words from a magazine about to go out of business.

johnomd said...

Nah, the parasites are never going to let the golden goose slip away. The time to have taken some action to break up the federal government was in the '94 takeover, at the absolute latest. By the time the average Joe will even consider the arguments for state's rights, much less outright succession, we'll be way to small a demographic to effect any real change. Don't be fooled, the Left will 100% draw fellow American blood to keep on truckin towards a collectivist, rainbow utopia. There are problems and there a predicaments, sometime within my lifetime, this passed from the former to the later.

pat said...

A more prophetic headline would read.

"You're Young, You're black, You're busted".

We are only a few years away from mandatory preventative detention for all black male teens who fail in High School. Black male teens have gone feral. They can't get jobs, which means they can't be socialized. The domesticated (tame) peoples will have to lock 'em up.

Americans underestimate the seriousness of black teen unemployment. Employment creates citizens. For example, if you show up to work late and drunk you won't be employed long. You won't be tolerated if you steal either. But government benefits like welfare and food stamps that presently sustain black communities do not require good behavior. Cheat on welfare and you are still eligible - in most cases you don't even have to pay it back.

The cost in lost socialization is not counted when people calculate the costs of entitlements. But for a rich country it is the most important cost.

A black male teen is a profile category. So we will see some push back from civil rights groups if the media starts to view crime in this way. But it must come.

The four years of the Obama administration have already wounded America. What happened to those black male fifteen year olds that were in high school in 2008?

They didn't get jobs. They were like Trayvon Martin - street kids who got connected with drugs and crime instead. They cannot be allowed to mix with normal people (their prey).

I think we will soon have proposals to enlist school drop outs in some kind of nature conservancy camps. Put those inner city kids out in the healthful outdoors. Heal the environment! Save the planet!!!

At first it will be a choice. Later not a choice.

Albertosaurus

Whiskey said...

The UK is destined for the same thing. The EDL and British Freedom Party leadership were jailed (with Muslims) for "anti-Muslim activities" and the future of Britain is a Sharia state, Pakistan upon the North Sea.

Why? Some blame "the Jews" or "neocons" because they are desperate to avoid the bitter truth. Most White women HATE HATE HATE most White men, and would gladly see them exterminated. Not all. But most. And that hated is most bitter, and focused, among younger White women. Who find most White guys to be boring beta males worthy of extinction.

Understanding female desire is very, very hard for guys. It is different from men. It is only partially visual, much of it is social. About 90% of all men are sexually invisible to repulsive to their female peers based on social standing, behavior, attitude, and dominance assessment alone.

If you asked most young White women, they'd be happy to see the beta male and lower cadres of their peers exterminated. Why not? Then every guy would be Alpha. That's whats behind it. Female hypergamy gone wild. The strength of the West, its better treatment and independence of women, gone wild like a cancer.

And by the way, Obama LOST the election. We all know he lost. He did lose. He just cheated. The process for verifying valid votes is broken. It exists on the honor system.

Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Al Gore, and John Kerry did not engage in widespread fraud. To their credit. Romney thought he would win. He had access to the best internal polling he could buy. But lets get real. Anyone with the will and the money can buy around 3-6 million votes. Street voting prices run around $50 a vote. Sometimes lower.

Steve has written about how the weakness of the West is honesty and trust. While that allows lots of things like moon landings, which places like Italy (low trust) can't do; it leaves us vulnerable. Everyone knows Obama cheated to win. And that every Dem from now on will run as honest a campaign as Chicago's, with the media, government, law, and police forces on their side. That means the 62% of Whites who voted for Romney, have no voice or hope of a voice in politics. Which means a "Golden Dawn" thing will come soon, with all the blood and violence and loss that implies.

Steve you've opened my eyes and I owe you a lot. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE consider moving your family to someplace safe like New Zealand as soon as possible.

Marc B said...

Why would a white person of any political stripe not want to burn a magazine cheering the demise of their race?

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure why conservatives are making such a big deal out of this election. It has been clear for a couple of decades that changing demographics have made America into a dump. The rise of the liberal Republicans during Dubya's administration and scheme to pander to foreigners basically showed that the country had been lost - and that was 10+ years ago.

dem hater said...

I notice that no one ever responds to Pat'Osaurus. Here's the problem with his prediction of mass preventative detention of young blacks: the cops have already decided to stop showing up for work, adopting the same welfare mentality as the unemployable black youths themselves. Spend some time driving around SF - and gauge how long it takes to spot a police car. All I can conclude is that the union has negotiated such air-tight protection against discipline that they call in sick for weeks at a time. The only upside is that if you pack on the street, you're not likely to be discovered.

Anonymous said...

"Big words from a magazine about to go out of business."

But their ideological allies--google and facebook--own the future. And newsweek can say 'mission accomplished' before going digital.

Anonymous said...

"After all, Asians are makers than takers in the economy, but even more of them went for Obama. So, it can't be just economic."

Republicans are doomed. Latinos wont vote for republicans for economic reasons and asians wont vote for republicans for racial reasons.

Anonymous said...

"Will this economically save America? With all these high IQ hard working Asian drones coming here, will they pay the taxes to pay for retired boomers and black government workers?" - You mean like California?

Anonymous said...

"Americans underestimate the seriousness of black teen unemployment." - The media doesn't talk about youth employment in general, because all youth employment ills go straight back to the national question.

Anonymous said...

Although liberals have relatively few children, they're importing more than enough fecund Mestizos to ensure their legacy of hate against white Americans will be carried to a resounding victory.

Anonymous said...

"I'm not sure why conservatives are making such a big deal out of this election. It has been clear for a couple of decades that changing demographics have made America into a dump."

For us, it's 'we told you so moment'.
For mainstream repubs, it's Wake Up moment.

gummster said...

What's really depressing is not non-whites voting for Obam.

It's a whopping 41% of whites voting for Obama. Among young whites, 49% voted for Obama!!!

Whites have been white guilted, black thrilled, jungle feverized, hip hop-ized, and PC-ized.

Anonymous said...

"Will this economically save America? With all these high IQ hard working Asian drones coming here, will they pay the taxes to pay for retired boomers and black government workers?" - You mean like California?

----------

I dunno, economic situation might be even worse without them. But the seem to be anti-white, so the hell with them.
But so many whites are anti-white. And those asians learned leftism and multiculti stuff from white elites.

Anonymous said...

white elite message to asians:

"hate white masses"

Anonymous said...

"And that hated is most bitter, and focused, among younger White women. Who find most White guys to be boring beta males worthy of extinction."

Okay, time for white men to all convert to Islam and become macho male patriarch types. white bitchese will respect them then.

Anonymous said...

"And by the way, Obama LOST the election. We all know he lost. He did lose. He just cheated. The process for verifying valid votes is broken. It exists on the honor system."

You mean white Iowans are that corrupt?

TGGP said...

Whiskey, did you miss the New Yorker article? Most white women voted Romney. Because they HATE HATE HATE white men?

Anonymous said...

It reminds me of R. Crumb's ("Keep on Truckin'") classic cartoon "When the G-d Damn N---s Take Over America!"

YO DAY HA' PASSED HONKY!

Maxwell said...

Don't worry, soon they'll be over gloating the demise of the old, feeble, worthless white man, and be back to pushing the narrative of helpless blacks being crushed by wicked white men who control all the power in the US.

Rev. Right said...

Anonymous said...
I am really really really baffled by whites who behave like this and welcome this.. are they really this stupid??
---------

There are people who get off on being whipped or over having nails driven through their genitals, so, yes.

Rev. Right said...

Re: Porter @ 11/8/12 7:31 PM

Bingo.

ForumPoliticum said...

Newsweek is dancing on our own graves - http://www.forumpoliticum.com/2012/11/14/newsweeks-dancing-on-our-graves/