Mr. Bush, 66, who has remained largely removed from the spotlight in the four years since leaving the White House, returned to television screens on Monday in a series of hospital snapshots with his new granddaughter, Mila, who was born to Jenna and Henry Hager in New York on Saturday night.
Second: You can make a tax deductible contribution via VDARE by clicking here. (Paypal and credit cards accepted, including recurring "subscription" donations.) UPDATE: Don't try this at the moment.
Third: send money via the Paypal-like Google Wallet to my Gmail address (that's isteveslrATgmail.com -- replace the AT with a @). (Non-tax deductible.)
Here's the Google Wallet FAQ. From it: "You will need to have (or sign up for) Google Wallet to send or receive money. If you have ever purchased anything on Google Play, then you most likely already have a Google Wallet. If you do not yet have a Google Wallet, don’t worry, the process is simple: go to wallet.google.com and follow the steps." You probably already have a Google ID and password, which Google Wallet uses, so signing up Wallet is pretty painless.
You can put money into your Google Wallet Balance from your bank account and send it with no service fee.
Or you can send money via credit card (Visa, MasterCard, AmEx, Discover) with the industry-standard 2.9% fee. (You don't need to put money into your Google Wallet Balance to do this.)
Google Wallet works from both a website and a smartphone app (Android and iPhone -- the Google Wallet app is currently available only in the U.S., but the Google Wallet website can be used in 160 countries).
Or, once you sign up with Google Wallet, you can simply send money via credit card, bank transfer, or Wallet Balance as an attachment from Google's free Gmail email service. Here's how to do it.
(Non-tax deductible.)
Fourth: if you have a Wells Fargo bank account, you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Wells Fargo SurePay. Just tell WF SurePay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). (Non-tax deductible.)
Fifth: if you have a Chase bank account (or, theoretically,other bank accounts), you can transfer money to me (with no fees) via Chase QuickPay (FAQ). Just tell Chase QuickPay to send the money to my ancient AOL email address (steveslrATaol.com -- replace the AT with the usual @). If Chase asks for the name on my account, it's Steven Sailer with an n at the end of Steven. (Non-tax deductible.)
Posts
21 comments:
The French got it right way back when. No more Bush's, no more Kennedy's.
Not happening -- not Vibrant or Diverse enough. It will definitely be a Jeb Bush descendant.
Besides, I don't know if there will still be a USA by then, but there definitely won't be a GOP, thank God.
For cryin' out loud, wasn't the cheesy TV 'Dynasty' already one dynasty too many for us?
Another Bush? Sheesh, we may as well elect a monarch to serve for life and whose heirs would inherit the throne through some warped feminist corruption of primogeniture.
By 2060, the world will be deep in the throes of a Mad Max style dystopia.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/14/books/review/clive-james-by-the-book.html?_r=1&
I'm not that desperate. Perhaps the GOP is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=371ySKWZ9mU
Cute, but politics has been getting more racial every election. This will continue and in less than 10 years, Whites will be voting as a block in much larger numbers.
And other blocks will emerge. There is nothing sacred about 2 party system. Once we are more fragmented, Whites go from being a majority with no power, to the most powerful minority ever.
Auntie Analogue:
"we may as well elect a monarch to serve for life and whose heirs would inherit"
If your position at the top is guaranteed, then you would be motivated to competently manage your dominions as if it were your private property. You would even be motivated to plan for the long term future because your genetically-related heirs will inherit it after you die.
With democracy it's get the majority to vote for you or die; anything goes. Dole out benefits for votes. Have massive immigration of voters for your party. Ruin the country if you have to, as long as you win the election.
The Republican party doesn't have anyone besides the Bush family. It sucks, but it is what it is.
The next Republican president is probably going to be Jeb or George P.
An odd name for a 'patrician' family.
A slavic name/nickname. Even Mila Kunis' real first name is not "Mila".
You would think given their backgrounds they would chose something more in line with their family history and culture. Something like "dorothy".
Breaking news today is that neither GHWB-41 nor GWB-43 are attending Margaret Thatcher's funeral.
Boy, the elites REALLY HATED that poor woman.
And the elites know how to carry a grudge.
There is nothing sacred about 2 party system.
Except that it is a natural result of first-past-post elections with single rep districts. Southern strategy, Northern strategy, Sailer strategy.. What ever strategy it shall have Republican party will exist for a foreseeable future.
What should happen may or may not happen. What cannot happen, will not happen.
Anonydroid at 11:49 pm said: If your position at the top is guaranteed, then you would be motivated to competently manage your dominions as if it were your private property. You would even be motivated to plan for the long term future because your genetically-related heirs will inherit it after you die.
Hunsdon: In Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev regards the country as his property, and plans to hand it down to his kids. He's an autocrat, but he plays a pretty good hand in a tough neighborhood. Without venturing into hagiography, there are plenty of worse leaders in the world.
He's got a long term interest in seeing the family business prosper.
We need to explore the permanence of the two party system. I think Steve wrote something on why there are usually two parties.
But we have had 3 way Presidential races before. And as we become racially fragmented, it seems a likely outcome. The elites will want it to remain that way, but remember this:
Blacks and Browns on the Dem side are getting tired of being represented by White guys/gals. This should be very interesting in the next 10 years.
In the immortal words of the man we mostly thought might be the first black president, STAY OUT DA BUSHES.
Why does ever President get their own library, presidential center, etc? We should not suffer these clowns to erect shrines to themselves. In the past, good taste prevented it. But of course, the shameless vulgarians we now elect (or who are elected for us) to the office are incapable of anything like good taste.
Will there be a GOP in 2060?
Anonymous 11:49 wrote:
If your position at the top is guaranteed, then you would be motivated to competently manage your dominions as if it were your private property. You would even be motivated to plan for the long term future because your genetically-related heirs will inherit it after you die.
Hunsdon wrote:
He's [Nazarbayev] got a long term interest in seeing the family business prosper.
The Kim family business in North Korea, the Assad family business in Syria, what would have become of the Hussein family business in Iraq (had we not overthrown them in 2003), the Castro family business in Cuba, the former Duvalier family business in Haiti, among others, all stand as refutations of the above line of thinking.
Many people voted for Obama just so they could be part of "making history" be electing America's first black president.
So why not want to be part of "making history" by electing the first 3-generational presidential dynasty?
Question: Consider the choice of patrilineal vs. matrilineal, with men holding the office, but daughters (or sisters) passing the right to office.
The main point being there may be a difference in the leadership potential of lineal heirs due to mate selection. High status women may be more likely than high status men to choose mates that have high probability of producing offspring with leadership character.
Neil Templeton
Post a Comment